Aaron Wolf at 2015-02-13T07:48:32Z
Mike Linksvayer , Christopher Allan Webber like this.
mray , Christopher Allan Webber , Mike Linksvayer , Charles ☕ Stanhope shared this.
Show all 5 replies
@o1me IMO celebrity effects for faif projects are needed -- more very strong projects, clear winners among faif projects that are strong enough to destroy proprietary competition are needed. Marketing, sales, distribution -- creating celebrities -- are what proprietary entities actually do -- let's finally really compete with and destroy them.
But lots of people have doubts when encountering the formula, I certainly do. Please add to discussion at https://snowdrift.coop/p/snowdrift/w/en/mechanism/d :)
But lots of people have doubts when encountering the formula, I certainly do. Please add to discussion at https://snowdrift.coop/p/snowdrift/w/en/mechanism/d :)
Mike Linksvayer at 2015-02-13T19:38:03Z
Claes Wallin (韋嘉誠) , Christopher Allan Webber , mray like this.
@o1me the simplest answer is: (A) we're just going with our best proposal to launch, and can adapt as needed, and (B) our mission right now is to get to the point where celebrity-FLO-project-takes-all is the sort of problem we have! (versus the status quo of: even celebrity projects are struggling and failing too often).
If you really want to read more on this exact issue, see https://snowdrift.coop/p/snowdrift/w/en/limits
If you really want to read more on this exact issue, see https://snowdrift.coop/p/snowdrift/w/en/limits
Wow, I just understood what SnowDrift was from [email protected]'s comment (the cubic root bit, which I heard RMS mention). That's great!
But, if I have to say, it wasn't actually clear to me that this is what SnowDrift was the first time I read (shallowly) about it.
But, if I have to say, it wasn't actually clear to me that this is what SnowDrift was the first time I read (shallowly) about it.
Olivier Mehani at 2015-02-14T07:52:22Z
Mike Linksvayer likes this.
Anyone know first time rms mentioned cubic root idea? Recent one is https://stallman.org/articles/internet-sharing-license.en.html
I think it is a reasonable idea for an entity (probably a government) that wishes to distribute funds to creators. It is fundamentally flawed if copyright holders used as a proxy for creators. It should have zilch to do with copyright.
I think it is a reasonable idea for an entity (probably a government) that wishes to distribute funds to creators. It is fundamentally flawed if copyright holders used as a proxy for creators. It should have zilch to do with copyright.